Prediction of Carson Branstine [207th] vs Madison Sieg [364th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W W W L
Form
W W W L L W L W L LH2H: Branstine 1 - 0 Sieg
They have played 2 sets in total, with Branstine winning 2 and Sieg winning 0. The last match between Branstine and Sieg was at the W35 Arcadia, 27-02-2025, First, Hard with Carson Branstine getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carson Branstine | 1 |
| Madison Sieg | 0 |
| Branstine | Stats | Sieg |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (18-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (7-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 207 | Ranking | 364 |
| 192 | Highest Rank | 294 |
| 24 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 2 |
| 66% (130-67) | Career Total W/L | 54% (104-89) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Carson Branstine
Player
Madison Sieg
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:28:5 | Average Match Time | 1:28:5 |
| 48% (24/50) | 1st Serve % | 59% (39/66) |
| 83% (20/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (23/39) |
| 58% (15/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 47% (31/66) | Return Points Win % | 30% (15/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carson Branstine vs Madison Sieg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Branstine 1 - 0 Sieg
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Branstine has won 41.21% of points on their second serve, while Sieg has won 42.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Branstine, in recent form, has won 45.01% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sieg has won 50.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.82% and 35.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Branstine has saved 51.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sieg has saved 54.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Branstine has won 65.38% of matches played (W/L 34/ 18), with Sieg winning 49.15% (W/L 29/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Branstine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 87/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Sieg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 60/ 52).
- Player level: In the last year, Branstine has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68% of matches (W/L 34/ 16), where as Sieg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.15% of matches (W/L 29/ 30). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Branstine winning 1 times and Sieg being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Branstine winning 2 and Sieg winning 0. The last match between Branstine and Sieg was at the W35 Arcadia, 27-02-2025, First, Hard with Carson Branstine getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:5.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Branstine and Sieg have played a deciding set 0 times, with Branstine winning 0 times and Sieg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Branstine winning 0, and Sieg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Branstine has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.42 while Sieg has played against players with an average rank of 236.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Branstine has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sieg has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Branstine has converted 45.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sieg has converted 39.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Carson Branstine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Ana Filipa Santos
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
19%
(
6 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Kayla Cross
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Sara Daavettila
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Cadence Brace
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Jenny Lim
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Carson Branstine
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Carson Branstine
73%
(
76 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
75 of
123)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
123)
113
Total Points Won
114
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Haruna Arakawa
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Madison Sieg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Madison Sieg
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
12
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Madison Sieg
48%
(
11 of
23)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
35
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Unknown Player
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Emma Lene
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Madison Sieg
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mary Stoiana
Player
Madison Sieg
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Alexis Nguyen
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Despina Papamichail
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Maria Kononova
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Branstine vs Sieg?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Branstine Vs Sieg is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (130/67) | Win/Loss | 54% (104/89) |
| 63% (284/165) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (226/212) |
| 55% (2238/1806) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1989/1952) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 398 | Aces Total | 227 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 656 | Total Double Faults | 669 |
| 1:27:19 | Average Match Time | 1:41:48 |
| 220.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 273.48 |
| 61% (7047/11595) | 1st Serve % | 63% (7456/11920) |
| 65% (4554/7047) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4426/7456) |
| 46% (2085/4548) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2009/4464) |
| 50% (733/1468) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (758/1566) |
| 47% (5326/11401) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5627/12170) |
| 66% (129/195) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (102/189) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 52% (23/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (16/30) |
| 56% (31/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (34/52) |
| 91% (127/115) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (95/86) |
| 9% (127/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (95/9) |
| 21% (70/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (98/18) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
